Skip to main content

AWS SOA-C02 Drill: Route 53 Routing Policies - Traffic Management by Resource Location

Jeff Taakey
Author
Jeff Taakey
21+ Year Enterprise Architect | AWS SAA/SAP & Multi-Cloud Expert.

Jeff’s Note
#

Unlike generic exam dumps, ADH analyzes this scenario through the lens of a Real-World Site Reliability Engineer (SRE).

For SOA-C02 candidates, the confusion often lies in understanding the subtle differences between Route 53 routing policies designed to optimize traffic based on geography, proximity, or latency. In production, this is about knowing exactly how Route 53 routes requests according to user location versus AWS resource location. Let’s drill down.

The Certification Drill (Simulated Question)
#

Scenario
#

Techwave Solutions is a rapidly growing SaaS provider expanding its web application infrastructure to serve customers worldwide. The SRE team at Techwave has deployed the application backend across multiple AWS regions to improve availability and performance globally. To optimize user experience, they require DNS-based routing of incoming requests so that users are routed precisely based on the physical location of the AWS resources serving the application.

The Requirement
#

The SRE engineer must select a Route 53 routing policy that routes user requests according to the exact geographic region in which backend resources reside, ensuring traffic goes to the closest data center by fixed geographic segments.

The Options
#

  • A) Geolocation Routing Policy
  • B) Geoproximity Routing Policy
  • C) Latency Routing Policy
  • D) Multivalue Answer Routing Policy

Google adsense
#

leave a comment:

Correct Answer
#

A) Geolocation Routing Policy

Quick Insight: The SysOps Imperative
#

  • Route 53 Geolocation routing routes DNS queries based strictly on the geographic location of the requesting user and the geographic location you define for your endpoint.
  • This contrasts with Geoproximity routing which dynamically adjusts traffic based on proximity and configurable bias, and Latency routing which routes based on lowest latency as measured by AWS — neither strictly enforcing hard geographic boundaries.

Content Locked: The Expert Analysis
#

You’ve identified the answer. But do you know the implementation details that separate a Junior from a Senior?


The Expert’s Analysis
#

Correct Answer
#

Option A: Geolocation Routing Policy

The Winning Logic
#

  • Geolocation routing lets you route traffic based on the location of the DNS resolver making the request. You specify geographic regions (e.g., continents, countries, or states) and associate resources with them.
  • This routing type strictly sends user requests to resources based on their defined geographic region, perfect for scenarios requiring geographically segmented traffic management.
  • It supports use cases such as compliance (data sovereignty), content localization, or directing traffic precisely by country or continent.

The Trap (Distractor Analysis)
#

  • Why not B) Geoproximity Routing?
    Geoproximity routing is similar but routes traffic based on proximity and can be shifted dynamically using bias values. It is enhanced for adjusting traffic percentages and load balancing near borders but doesn’t enforce strict geographic boundaries.

  • Why not C) Latency Routing?
    Latency routing directs requests to the endpoint with the lowest measured latency from the user’s location, which may not strictly correspond to a particular geographic boundary if latency varies.

  • Why not D) Multivalue Answer Routing?
    Multivalue answer routing returns multiple healthy endpoints to the DNS client for simple load balancing but does not provide location-aware routing based on geography or proximity.


The Technical Blueprint
#

# Example CLI to create a Route 53 Geolocation record set

aws route53 change-resource-record-sets --hosted-zone-id Z3EXAMPLE \
--change-batch '{
    "Changes": [
        {
            "Action": "UPSERT",
            "ResourceRecordSet": {
                "Name": "app.techwave.com",
                "Type": "A",
                "SetIdentifier": "US-West",
                "GeoLocation": {
                    "CountryCode": "US",
                    "SubdivisionCode": "CA"
                },
                "TTL": 300,
                "ResourceRecords": [{ "Value": "192.0.2.44" }]
            }
        }
    ]
}'

The Comparative Analysis
#

Option Operational Overhead Automation Level Impact on Traffic Routing
A) Geolocation Routing Moderate Moderate Precise routing based on fixed geographic regions
B) Geoproximity Routing High High Dynamic routing adjusted by proximity and bias
C) Latency Routing Low Low Routes based on lowest latency, not strict region
D) Multivalue Routing Low Moderate Simple round robin with health checks, no geo logic

Real-World Application (Practitioner Insight)
#

Exam Rule
#

“For the exam, always pick Geolocation routing when the requirement is routing strictly by fixed geographic boundaries.”

Real World
#

“In production, many companies blend geoproximity or latency routing for better performance and resilience near borders, but geolocation routing remains the go-to when strict traffic isolation by country or region is mandated.”


(CTA) Stop Guessing, Start Mastering
#


Disclaimer

This is a study note based on simulated scenarios for the SOA-C02 exam.

The DevPro Network: Mission and Founder

A 21-Year Tech Leadership Journey

Jeff Taakey has driven complex systems for over two decades, serving in pivotal roles as an Architect, Technical Director, and startup Co-founder/CTO.

He holds both an MBA degree and a Computer Science Master's degree from an English-speaking university in Hong Kong. His expertise is further backed by multiple international certifications including TOGAF, PMP, ITIL, and AWS SAA.

His experience spans diverse sectors and includes leading large, multidisciplinary teams (up to 86 people). He has also served as a Development Team Lead while cooperating with global teams spanning North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific. He has spearheaded the design of an industry cloud platform. This work was often conducted within global Fortune 500 environments like IBM, Citi and Panasonic.

Following a recent Master’s degree from an English-speaking university in Hong Kong, he launched this platform to share advanced, practical technical knowledge with the global developer community.


About This Site: AWS.CertDevPro.com


AWS.CertDevPro.com focuses exclusively on mastering the Amazon Web Services ecosystem. We transform raw practice questions into strategic Decision Matrices. Led by Jeff Taakey (MBA & 21-year veteran of IBM/Citi), we provide the exclusive SAA and SAP Master Packs designed to move your cloud expertise from certification-ready to project-ready.