Jeff’s Note #
Unlike generic exam dumps, ADH analyzes this scenario through the lens of a Real-World Lead Developer.
For AWS DVA-C02 candidates, the confusion often lies in choosing the best AWS service for global low-latency content delivery without adding unnecessary complexity. In production, this comes down to understanding how CloudFront integrates with ALB origins and how Route 53 routing policies impact performance and operational overhead. Let’s drill down.
The Certification Drill (Simulated Question) #
Scenario #
Nimbus Learning Inc. runs its e-learning web application on Amazon EC2 instances behind an Application Load Balancer (ALB). The company uses Amazon Route 53 to manage its application’s domain name and currently deploys the app in a single AWS Region. With an expanding global user base, Nimbus aims to improve the application’s responsiveness worldwide with as little operational overhead as possible.
The Requirement: #
Select the AWS architecture approach that improves global application performance with minimal operational complexity.
The Options #
- A) Configure an Amazon CloudFront distribution with the ALB as the origin. Update Route 53 to use a DNS Alias record pointing to the CloudFront distribution’s domain name.
- B) Increase the number of EC2 instances behind the ALB, enable sticky sessions on the ALB, and configure Route 53 with a geolocation routing policy pointing to the ALB.
- C) Create an AWS Client VPN endpoint inside the VPC, require users to connect via the VPN to access the application, and configure Route 53 with a geolocation routing policy pointing to the VPN endpoint.
- D) Deploy application stacks in multiple AWS Regions, create ALBs in each Region, and configure Route 53 with latency-based routing directing users to the nearest Region’s ALB.
Google adsense #
leave a comment:
Correct Answer #
A.
Quick Insight: The Dev-Focused Network Optimization Imperative #
For developers, the choice hinges on leveraging CloudFront’s global edge network combined with an ALB origin to offload static/dynamic caching and minimize latency — all without complex multi-region deployment or client VPN overhead.
Content Locked: The Expert Analysis #
You’ve identified the answer. But do you know the implementation details that separate a Junior from a Senior?
The Expert’s Analysis #
Correct Answer #
Option A
The Winning Logic #
CloudFront acts as a globally distributed content delivery network (CDN) that caches both static and dynamic content close to users, significantly reducing latency. By using the ALB as the origin, the developer preserves all the capabilities of the ALB while accelerating delivery worldwide. Route 53’s Alias record pointing to CloudFront enables seamless DNS resolution without added latency or management overhead. This approach improves performance globally with minimal changes and operational complexity.
Specific Developer Notes:
- CloudFront supports origin failover and advanced cache policies to optimize API or web app responsiveness.
- Minimal code or infrastructure changes are required.
- No need to handle session affinity or manage multi-region data consistency.
The Trap (Distractor Analysis): #
- Why not B? Increasing EC2 and enabling sticky sessions helps scale in-region only and geolocation routing combined increases DNS complexity and may lead to inconsistent performance with high operational overhead. Sticky sessions decrease scalability and fault tolerance.
- Why not C? Client VPN endpoints create operational overhead and poor user experience due to VPN requirements. It is not a standard approach to improve global app performance.
- Why not D? Multi-region deployments require complex infrastructure, databases synchronization, increased costs, and operational burden, exceeding the minimal overhead requirement.
The Technical Blueprint #
Developer Code Snippet: Creating CloudFront Distribution with ALB Origin #
aws cloudfront create-distribution --distribution-config '{
"CallerReference": "unique-string",
"Aliases": {
"Quantity": 1,
"Items": ["www.nimbuslearning.com"]
},
"Origins": {
"Quantity": 1,
"Items": [{
"Id": "ALBOrigin1",
"DomainName": "my-alb-1234567890.us-east-1.elb.amazonaws.com",
"CustomOriginConfig": {
"HTTPPort": 80,
"HTTPSPort": 443,
"OriginProtocolPolicy": "https-only"
}
}]
},
"DefaultCacheBehavior": {
"TargetOriginId": "ALBOrigin1",
"ViewerProtocolPolicy": "redirect-to-https",
"AllowedMethods": {
"Quantity": 3,
"Items": ["GET","HEAD","OPTIONS"],
"CachedMethods": {
"Quantity": 2,
"Items": ["GET","HEAD"]
}
},
"ForwardedValues": {
"QueryString": false,
"Cookies": {"Forward": "none"}
}
},
"Enabled": true
}'
The Comparative Analysis #
| Option | API/Config Complexity | Performance Impact | Use Case Fit |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | Low - simple CloudFront setup | High - global edge caching | Best fit for minimal overhead, quick global acceleration |
| B | Moderate - sticky sessions + geo DNS | Medium - limited to in-region scaling | Complex, increases statefulness and overhead |
| C | High - VPN infrastructure + routing | Low - poor user experience | Not suitable for web app global performance |
| D | Very high - multi-region infra + sync | Very High - fastest at global scale but costly | Complex for minimal overhead requirement |
Real-World Application (Practitioner Insight) #
Exam Rule #
For the exam, always pick CloudFront when you see terms like global users and performance improvement with minimal operational overhead.
Real World #
In production, multi-region deployments (Option D) provide best global availability but come with database complexity and higher costs. For many apps, using CloudFront as a front door is the easiest way to achieve global acceleration without multi-region operational burden.
(CTA) Stop Guessing, Start Mastering #
Disclaimer
This is a study note based on simulated scenarios for the AWS DVA-C02 exam.