Skip to main content

AWS DVA-C02 Drill: ECS Fargate Migration - Minimizing Downtime with Capacity Providers

Jeff Taakey
Author
Jeff Taakey
21+ Year Enterprise Architect | AWS SAA/SAP & Multi-Cloud Expert.

Jeff’s Note
#

Unlike generic exam dumps, ADH analyzes this scenario through the lens of a Real-World Lead Developer.

For DVA-C02 candidates, the confusion often lies in correctly leveraging ECS capacity providers during migration to Fargate with zero or minimal downtime. In production, this is about knowing exactly how to configure capacity provider order and base values to control task placement on different compute platforms without service disruption. Let’s drill down.

The Certification Drill (Simulated Question)
#

Scenario
#

TechNova Solutions currently runs a business-critical microservices application on Amazon ECS backed by Amazon EC2 instances. The development team plans to migrate this application to run fully on Fargate to reduce infrastructure management overhead. To enable a seamless migration, they want to configure ECS capacity providers so tasks gradually transition from EC2 Launch Type to Fargate Launch Type with minimal downtime and no service disruption.

The Requirement:
#

Determine the ECS capacity provider API operation and configuration strategy that meets these conditions with the LEAST downtime during migration.

The Options
#

  • A) Use the PutClusterCapacityProviders API operation to associate the ECS cluster with the FARGATE and FARGATE_SPOT capacity providers. Set FARGATE as Provider 1 with a base value, and FARGATE_SPOT as Provider 2 for failover.
  • B) Use the CreateCapacityProvider API operation to associate the ECS cluster with the FARGATE and FARGATE_SPOT capacity providers. Set FARGATE as Provider 1 with a base value, and FARGATE_SPOT as Provider 2 for failover.
  • C) Use the PutClusterCapacityProviders API operation to associate the ECS cluster with the FARGATE and FARGATE_SPOT capacity providers. Set FARGATE_SPOT as Provider 1 with a base value, and FARGATE as Provider 2 for failover.
  • D) Use the CreateCapacityProvider API operation to associate the ECS cluster with the FARGATE and FARGATE_SPOT capacity providers. Set FARGATE_SPOT as Provider 1 with a base value, and FARGATE as Provider 2 for failover.

Google adsense
#

leave a comment:

Correct Answer
#

A

Quick Insight: The DVA-C02 Imperative
#

  • When migrating ECS tasks to Fargate with minimal downtime, using the PutClusterCapacityProviders API to update an existing ECS cluster’s capacity providers is essential. This allows a smooth transition by setting FARGATE as the primary capacity provider with a base value to ensure a minimum number of tasks run on Fargate immediately.
  • The base value influences how many tasks launch initially on that provider during deployment; using FARGATE as Provider 1 with base value ensures new tasks start on Fargate.
  • Failover to FARGATE_SPOT for cost savings without sacrificing availability is a savvy option, but primary placement must be FARGATE for stability during migration.
  • CreateCapacityProvider is for creating new capacity providers, not for associating pre-existing ones with clusters.

Content Locked: The Expert Analysis
#

You’ve identified the answer. But do you know the implementation details that separate a Junior from a Senior?


The Expert’s Analysis
#

Correct Answer
#

Option A

The Winning Logic
#

This solution utilizes the PutClusterCapacityProviders API operation, which is the correct method to update the capacity providers for an existing ECS cluster. It associates both the FARGATE and FARGATE_SPOT capacity providers and sets FARGATE as Provider 1 with a base value, ensuring that a minimum number of tasks run on Fargate immediately upon deployment. This approach helps maintain service availability and minimizes downtime during the migration. Placing FARGATE_SPOT as the secondary provider for failover saves costs without risking availability.

By contrast:

  • Using CreateCapacityProvider (Options B and D) is incorrect because this API call creates new capacity providers but does not assign capacity providers to clusters. The capacity providers FARGATE and FARGATE_SPOT are AWS-managed and pre-existing, so you associate them with clusters via PutClusterCapacityProviders.

  • Reversing provider priority by setting FARGATE_SPOT as Provider 1 with a base (Options C and D) increases risk since spot interruptions can cause downtime, which is unacceptable during migrations.


The Technical Blueprint
#

# Example CLI command equivalent to Option A
aws ecs put-cluster-capacity-providers \
  --cluster technova-ecs-cluster \
  --capacity-providers FARGATE FARGATE_SPOT \
  --default-capacity-provider-strategy capacityProvider=FARGATE,base=1,weight=1 capacityProvider=FARGATE_SPOT,weight=1

This command associates the pre-existing AWS managed capacity providers FARGATE and FARGATE_SPOT with the ECS cluster. It sets FARGATE as the primary capacity provider with a base of 1 task to ensure at least one task runs on Fargate, enabling task placement without downtime.


The Comparative Analysis
#

Option API Operation Provider Priority Base Value Setup Impact on Downtime Notes
A PutClusterCapacityProviders FARGATE (1st), FARGATE_SPOT (2nd) Base on FARGATE Minimal downtime Correct update method, ensures stability
B CreateCapacityProvider FARGATE (1st), FARGATE_SPOT (2nd) Base on FARGATE Not applicable Creates capacity providers, not association
C PutClusterCapacityProviders FARGATE_SPOT (1st), FARGATE (2nd) Base on FARGATE_SPOT Risk of downtime Spot interruptions risk during migration
D CreateCapacityProvider FARGATE_SPOT (1st), FARGATE (2nd) Base on FARGATE_SPOT Not applicable Incorrect API and risky setup

Real-World Application (Practitioner Insight)
#

Exam Rule
#

“For the exam, always use PutClusterCapacityProviders to associate ECS capacity providers when updating an existing cluster.”

Real World
#

“In production, a staged migration from EC2 launch type to Fargate often uses capacity providers with base values to gradually shift running tasks without killing services. Fargate Spot is a cost optimization but not ideal as primary placement during critical migrations due to possible interruptions.”


(CTA) Stop Guessing, Start Mastering
#


Disclaimer

This is a study note based on simulated scenarios for the AWS DVA-C02 exam.

The DevPro Network: Mission and Founder

A 21-Year Tech Leadership Journey

Jeff Taakey has driven complex systems for over two decades, serving in pivotal roles as an Architect, Technical Director, and startup Co-founder/CTO.

He holds both an MBA degree and a Computer Science Master's degree from an English-speaking university in Hong Kong. His expertise is further backed by multiple international certifications including TOGAF, PMP, ITIL, and AWS SAA.

His experience spans diverse sectors and includes leading large, multidisciplinary teams (up to 86 people). He has also served as a Development Team Lead while cooperating with global teams spanning North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific. He has spearheaded the design of an industry cloud platform. This work was often conducted within global Fortune 500 environments like IBM, Citi and Panasonic.

Following a recent Master’s degree from an English-speaking university in Hong Kong, he launched this platform to share advanced, practical technical knowledge with the global developer community.


About This Site: AWS.CertDevPro.com


AWS.CertDevPro.com focuses exclusively on mastering the Amazon Web Services ecosystem. We transform raw practice questions into strategic Decision Matrices. Led by Jeff Taakey (MBA & 21-year veteran of IBM/Citi), we provide the exclusive SAA and SAP Master Packs designed to move your cloud expertise from certification-ready to project-ready.