Jeff’s Note #
Unlike generic exam dumps, ADH analyzes this scenario through the lens of a Real-World Lead Developer.
For DVA-C02 candidates, the confusion often lies in proper event orchestration and handling concurrency in serverless workflows. In production, this is about knowing exactly how to coordinate parallel Lambda executions ensuring idempotent updates and conditional payment processing. Let’s drill down.
The Certification Drill (Simulated Question) #
Scenario #
StreamlineTicket Ltd. is building a serverless event ticketing platform where customers select available seats for a stadium. The front-end sends seat requests to an Amazon API Gateway, which triggers a Lambda function that acknowledges the order and generates a unique order ID. Behind the scenes, two Lambda functions run in parallel: one manages seat inventory, and the other handles payment processing. Both Lambda functions update a shared Amazon DynamoDB table with order information.
The business rules require that if a particular seat is accidentally double-booked, only the first order received should be allocated the seat and charged. If the first order’s payment fails, the seat must be re-allocated to the second order, and only that order’s payment processed.
The Requirement: #
Design a serverless pattern that ensures the seat is only sold once (to the earliest order), that payment is only captured once according to the seat allocation result, and that payment can switch to a later order if the first fails.
The Options #
-
A) Send the order ID to an Amazon Simple Notification Service (Amazon SNS) FIFO topic that fans out to one Amazon Simple Queue Service (Amazon SQS) FIFO queue for inventory management and another SQS FIFO queue for payment processing.
-
B) Change the Lambda function that generates the order ID to invoke the inventory management Lambda first, then invoke the payment processing Lambda sequentially.
-
C) Send the order ID to an Amazon Simple Notification Service (Amazon SNS) standard topic. Subscribe the Lambda functions for inventory management and payment processing to this topic.
-
D) Deliver the order ID to an Amazon Simple Queue Service (Amazon SQS) standard queue. Configure the Lambda functions for inventory management and payment processing to poll the queue concurrently.
Google adsense #
leave a comment:
Correct Answer #
A
Quick Insight: The Developer Imperative #
Concurrent Lambda executions on parallel streams require strict ordering and deduplication guarantees. SNS FIFO topics combined with multiple SQS FIFO queues enable both ordered delivery and exactly-once processing semantics, critical for resolving race conditions.
The key nuance is using FIFO with message groups and separate queues removes duplicate seat assignments and prevents payment from being processed twice — essential in a concurrency-sensitive, serverless architecture.
Content Locked: The Expert Analysis #
You’ve identified the answer. But do you know the implementation details that separate a Junior from a Senior?
The Expert’s Analysis #
Correct Answer #
Option A
The Winning Logic #
Option A leverages an SNS FIFO topic to guarantee ordered message delivery by using message groups, which preserves the order in which ticket orders are processed. This SNS FIFO topic fans out to two separate SQS FIFO queues—one for inventory management and one for payment processing. Both queues support exactly-once processing and deduplication.
This design enables each Lambda function to process orders independently but in strict order. If the first order is allocated the seat and payment succeeds, the second order’s inventory update would fail or be skipped (detecting seat unavailability), and its payment will not be processed. If the first payment fails, the inventory logic can allow the next order to take the seat, triggering payment accordingly.
Key AWS developer API considerations include:
-
Using SNS FIFO topics with message groups for ordering.
-
SQS FIFO queues for idempotent, ordered message delivery.
-
Polling Lambda functions triggered via SQS event sources for scaling and retries.
-
Client-side or DynamoDB conditional updates (with conditional expressions) to enforce seat uniqueness transactionally.
The Trap (Distractor Analysis): #
-
Why not B?
Sequential Lambda invocation is brittle at scale. It introduces coupling and latency. Also, there’s no built-in guarantee of exactly-once processing or failure handling between these steps. -
Why not C?
SNS standard topics do not guarantee message order or deduplication. Parallel Lambdas could process messages out of order, causing race conditions and double charges. -
Why not D?
SQS standard queues do not guarantee message ordering, so simultaneous Lambda polling consumers could cause concurrency issues with seat allocation. No built-in FIFO semantics here.
The Technical Blueprint #
# Example CLI snippet to create SNS FIFO topic and SQS FIFO queues with subscriptions
aws sns create-topic --name orderEvents.fifo --attributes FifoTopic=true,ContentBasedDeduplication=true
aws sqs create-queue --queue-name inventoryQueue.fifo --attributes FifoQueue=true,ContentBasedDeduplication=true
aws sqs create-queue --queue-name paymentQueue.fifo --attributes FifoQueue=true,ContentBasedDeduplication=true
# Subscribe SQS queues to SNS FIFO topic with proper message group id usage
aws sns subscribe --topic-arn arn:aws:sns:region:account-id:orderEvents.fifo --protocol sqs --notification-endpoint arn:aws:sqs:region:account-id:inventoryQueue.fifo
aws sns subscribe --topic-arn arn:aws:sns:region:account-id:orderEvents.fifo --protocol sqs --notification-endpoint arn:aws:sqs:region:account-id:paymentQueue.fifo
The Comparative Analysis #
| Option | API Complexity | Performance | Use Case / Trade-Off |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | Medium - Uses SNS FIFO and SQS FIFO with subscriptions | High - Ordered, concurrent processing guaranteed | Ensures ordered, exactly-once processing with parallel functions; best for concurrency control |
| B | Lower - Sequential Lambda invokes | Lower - Slower, coupled functions, single-threaded workflow | Simple, but poor scalability, prone to latency and failure cascade |
| C | Low - SNS Standard publish/subscribe | Higher concurrency, unordered messages | Risk of race conditions, no ordering guarantees, not safe for seat uniqueness |
| D | Low - SQS Standard with Lambda polling | Higher concurrency, unordered | Lack of ordering leads to seat allocation conflicts and double processing |
Real-World Application (Practitioner Insight) #
Exam Rule #
“For the exam, always pick SNS FIFO + SQS FIFO when exact ordering and deduplication are required across multiple consumers.”
Real World #
“In practice, we might combine this pattern with DynamoDB conditional writes as the ultimate source of truth for seat allocation, alongside fine-tuned Lambda retries and error handling.”
(CTA) Stop Guessing, Start Mastering #
Disclaimer
This is a study note based on simulated scenarios for the AWS DVA-C02 exam.