AWS DVA-C02 Drill: Secure Credential Storage - Lambda & CloudFormation Automation

Jeff’s Note

#

Unlike generic exam dumps, ADH analyzes this scenario through the lens of a Real-World Lead Developer.
For DVA-C02 candidates, the confusion often lies in choosing the most secure and operationally efficient way to store sensitive credentials dynamically during deployment pipelines. In production, this is about knowing exactly which AWS service best manages secrets with least overhead while integrating smoothly with Lambda and CloudFormation automation. Let’s drill down.

The Certification Drill (Simulated Question)

#

Scenario

#

FinTech Solutions Inc., a fast-growing startup, is building a customer dashboard app that aggregates user accounts across numerous financial institutions. The engineering team automated the retrieval of each institution’s API credentials through a CI/CD pipeline that triggers an AWS Lambda function. This Lambda function runs as a custom resource inside an AWS CloudFormation stack to manage and provision these API credentials dynamically. The Dev team wants a solution that stores these API credentials with the highest security possible but also with minimal manual maintenance or operational overhead.

The Requirement

#

Determine the AWS-based solution that securely stores the API credentials generated during the Lambda invocation in the most operationally efficient way, integrated with the CloudFormation deployment.

The Options

#

• A) Add an AWS Secrets Manager GenerateSecretString resource to the CloudFormation template. Set the value to reference new credentials generated for the CloudFormation resource.
• B) Use the AWS SDK ssm:PutParameter API operation inside the Lambda function to store the credentials as a Systems Manager Parameter with type SecureString.
• C) Add an AWS Systems Manager Parameter Store resource directly in the CloudFormation template. Set the parameter value to the new credentials and activate the CloudFormation NoEcho attribute.
• D) Use the AWS SDK ssm:PutParameter operation inside the Lambda function and set the parameter value to the new credentials with a NoEcho attribute.

Google adsense

#

leave a comment:

Correct Answer

#

B

Quick Insight: The Developer Imperative

#

This drill focuses on secure runtime secrets management when automating resource provisioning via Lambda and CloudFormation. The key here is that dynamically generated credentials must be stored programmatically with encryption, and the operation must be handled at runtime within the Lambda, not statically in CloudFormation resources or relying solely on template attributes. Using SSM Parameter Store’s SecureString with encryption at this integration point is both secure and operationally minimal.

Content Locked: The Expert Analysis

#

You’ve identified the answer. But do you know the implementation details that separate a Junior from a Senior?

The Expert’s Analysis

#

Correct Answer

#

Option B

The Winning Logic

#

• The Lambda function is responsible for fetching or generating fresh API credentials dynamically at runtime. Thus, storing them also must happen programmatically during execution to reflect the current state.
• Using the AWS SDK ssm:PutParameter with SecureString ensures the parameter content is encrypted using AWS-managed KMS keys by default, protecting sensitive data at rest.
• This method neatly integrates with CloudFormation custom resources because the Lambda handles secret creation and storage in the same invocation, minimizing manual overhead and risk.
• The parameter can later be retrieved securely by downstream services, minimizing exposure.
• NoEcho applies only to CloudFormation template parameters to mask values during stack operations, but it does not encrypt or protect data at rest. Hence, it’s not sufficient to rely on NoEcho in this context.

The Trap (Distractor Analysis)

#

• Option A: While Secrets Manager is indeed designed for secrets, the question specifies that credentials are generated dynamically within the Lambda run, making inline CloudFormation generation impractical. Secrets Manager rotation and management come with additional costs and features which may be overkill here.
• Option C: Defining SSM parameters statically in a CloudFormation template with NoEcho might mask the value, but NoEcho is just a CloudFormation console masking feature and does not provide secure storage with encryption or runtime flexibility. Credentials generated dynamically cannot be hardcoded in the template.
• Option D: The SDK PutParameter does not take a NoEcho parameter; that attribute belongs to CloudFormation templates only. Hence, this is an invalid API usage and reflects a misunderstanding of the feature sets.

The Technical Blueprint

#

# Example AWS CLI command snippet the Lambda function might call to store SecureString:
aws ssm put-parameter \
    --name "/fintech/api/credential123" \
    --value "dynamic-api-secret-value" \
    --type SecureString \
    --overwrite

The Comparative Analysis

#

Real-World Application (Practitioner Insight)

#

Exam Rule

#

“For the exam, always pick Systems Manager Parameter Store SecureString when you need secure runtime storage of secrets generated dynamically inside Lambda-backed custom resources.”

Real World

#

“In real environments, teams often choose Secrets Manager for complex rotation and lifecycle management. However, for minimal overhead when just storing API credentials securely during deployments, Parameter Store SecureString is cost-effective and sufficient.”

(CTA) Stop Guessing, Start Mastering

#

Disclaimer

This is a study note based on simulated scenarios for the AWS DVA-C02 exam.