Jeff’s Note #
Unlike generic exam dumps, ADH analyzes this scenario through the lens of a Real-World Lead Developer.
For DVA-C02 candidates, the confusion often lies in how to reliably monitor CloudFront logs with as low latency as possible. In production, this is about knowing exactly which AWS log streaming options support true real-time ingestion and which rely on batch delivery, impacting how quickly errors and anomalies can be detected. Let’s drill down.
The Certification Drill (Simulated Question) #
Scenario #
TechNova Solutions runs a global media streaming web app hosted on AWS. To accelerate content delivery and protect origin infrastructure, they use an Amazon CloudFront distribution. The lead developer needs to build a monitoring dashboard that tracks error rates and detects anomalies in the CloudFront traffic with minimal delay. The solution should enable near real-time insight into CloudFront logs to trigger immediate investigation and mitigation.
The Requirement: #
Which combination of actions should the developer take to build the most timely and actionable monitoring dashboard for error rates and anomalies in CloudFront distributions? (Choose two.)
The Options #
-
A) Stream CloudFront standard access logs to an Amazon S3 bucket, then query error rates and anomalies periodically using Amazon Athena.
-
B) Enable CloudFront real-time logs and create a data stream in Amazon Kinesis Data Streams to ingest logs immediately.
-
C) Use Amazon Kinesis Data Streams with an AWS Lambda function to send CloudFront logs to Amazon OpenSearch Service and build a dashboard using OpenSearch Dashboards.
-
D) Stream CloudFront standard access logs to Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose for ingestion and delivery to storage or analytics.
-
E) Send CloudFront logs to AWS CloudTrail via Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose, then create CloudTrail metrics, alarms, and dashboards.
Google adsense #
leave a comment:
Correct Answer #
B and C.
Quick Insight: The Developer Imperative #
For DVA candidates, the critical distinction is between CloudFront’s standard access logs which are delivered in batches to S3 (introducing latency) and the newer real-time logging feature that pushes logs immediately to Kinesis Data Streams. To build a dashboard that surfaces error rates and anomalies as quickly as possible, real-time logs via Kinesis Data Streams (B) are necessary. Then, processing those streams with Lambda and delivering to OpenSearch Service (C) empowers near-instant visualization and anomaly detection.
Content Locked: The Expert Analysis #
You’ve identified the answer. But do you know the implementation details that separate a Junior from a Senior?
The Expert’s Analysis #
Correct Answer #
Options B and C
The Winning Logic #
-
Option B: CloudFront’s standard access logs are delivered with some delay (usually minutes) and stored in S3, so they do not support monitoring with minimal latency. Enabling real-time logs is the key differentiator here, as it provides continuous delivery of logs to Amazon Kinesis Data Streams almost immediately after the request completes.
-
Option C: Once logs are flowing through Kinesis Data Streams, integrating an AWS Lambda function to process and transform these streaming logs and send them to Amazon OpenSearch Service enables near real-time analytics and dashboarding with OpenSearch Dashboards. This meets the need for a developer dashboard showing error rates and anomalies frequently.
The Trap (Distractor Analysis): #
-
Why not A? Streaming standard logs to S3 with Athena queries is common for batch analytics, but the latency is too high for near real-time monitoring.
-
Why not D? Kinesis Data Firehose is excellent for reliable batch delivery to destinations like S3 or Redshift but does not ingest logs in real-time from CloudFront directly; it requires an upstream source like Kinesis Data Streams or Lambda.
-
Why not E? CloudTrail logs AWS API calls, not CloudFront access logs. CloudTrail metrics and alarms wouldn’t detect HTTP error rates or anomalies for CloudFront distributions.
The Technical Blueprint #
# Enable real-time logging on CloudFront distribution using AWS CLI
aws cloudfront update-distribution \
--id DIST_ID \
--distribution-config file://distribution-config.json
# Example: Create Kinesis Data Stream for receiving real-time logs
aws kinesis create-stream --stream-name CloudFrontRealTimeLogs --shard-count 1
# Lambda function code snippet (Node.js) snippet to index logs to OpenSearch
exports.handler = async (event) => {
event.records.forEach(record => {
// parse, transform, then put record to OpenSearch
});
};
# OpenSearch dashboard is configured pointing to the index created by Lambda
The Comparative Analysis #
| Option | API Complexity | Performance (Latency) | Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | Low (Athena SQL queries) | High latency (batch S3) | Historical log analysis |
| B | Moderate (Setup Kinesis) | Low latency (real-time) | Real-time ingestion of logs |
| C | Moderate (Lambda + ES) | Low latency + flexible | Real-time visualization & alerts |
| D | Moderate (Firehose) | Medium latency | Near real-time delivery to storage |
| E | Low (CloudTrail metrics) | Not applicable | Auditing AWS API, not HTTP logs |
Real-World Application (Practitioner Insight) #
Exam Rule #
“For the exam, always select CloudFront Real-Time Logs combined with Kinesis Data Streams when you need low-latency monitoring.”
Real World #
“In production, you might add Amazon OpenSearch (formerly Elasticsearch) or a third-party SIEM for real-time querying and alerting on logs streamed via Kinesis.”
(CTA) Stop Guessing, Start Mastering #
Disclaimer
This is a study note based on simulated scenarios for the DVA-C02 exam.